· 8/26/1997
Todd Edward Matthews v. United States
Citations
- 114 F.3d 112
- 1997 WL 265118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that regardless of counsel’s sentencing advice, movant could not show prejudice where court advised him of potential maximum sentence at plea proceeding and movant indicated he understood before pleading guilty
- test for challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel
- “Where the substantive law of the forum state is uncertain or ambiguous, the job of the federal courts is carefully to predict how the highest court of the forum state would resolve the uncertainty or ambiguity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hansen, Gibson, Henley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.