Skip to main content
· 8/26/1997

Todd Edward Matthews v. United States

Citations

  • 114 F.3d 112
  • 1997 WL 265118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that regardless of counsel’s sentencing advice, movant could not show prejudice where court advised him of potential maximum sentence at plea proceeding and movant indicated he understood before pleading guilty
  • test for challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel
  • “Where the substantive law of the forum state is uncertain or ambiguous, the job of the federal courts is carefully to predict how the highest court of the forum state would resolve the uncertainty or ambiguity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Gibson, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.