Todd E. Prater v. John Dahm Harold W. Clarke Aaron Hall Bobby C. Kilgore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “threats between inmates are common and do not, under all circumstances, serve to impute actual knowledge of a substantial risk of harm.”
• observing that “threats between inmates are common and do not, under all circumstances, serve to impute actual knowledge of a substantial risk of harm.”
• noting that “threats between inmates are common and do not, under all circumstances, serve to impute actual knowledge of a substantial risk of harm”
• reviewing de novo, explaining that officials must “actually know of a substantial risk” to be liable, and observing that not all threats “impute actual knowledge”
• stating the appellate court’s jurisdiction is limited and the court must “accept as true all facts pled by” the non-moving party at this stage of litigation
• assuming without deciding that inmate who assaulted plaintiff posed a substantial risk when prison officials knew that plaintiff had a relationship with the inmate’s wife, and the inmate threatened plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).