Todd Construction, L.P. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to “unsatisfactory performance evaluations” is a contract claim under this court’s CDA jurisdiction
• stating that past performance evaluations are “used by contracting officers in determining future contract awards”
• “The parties correctly agree that, as a general matter, this Court lacks authority to provide injunctive and equitable relief.”
• “[T]he defini- tion of the term ‘claim’ in the FAR governs” the use of that term in the Contract Disputes Act.
• “[T]he definition of the term ‘claim’ in the FAR governs[]” the use of that term in the Contract Disputes Act.
• To prevail, a bid protester must first “‘show that it was prejudiced by a significant error’ (i.e., ‘that but for the error, it would have had a substantial chance of securing the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).