Todd Armstrong v. Hayley Keeton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the creation of a constructive trust after the proceeds had been received by the beneficiary would violate SGLIA’s anti-attachment provision
• providing that under the design of the SGLIA, “the Government is the policyholder, rather than the insurer”
• providing an order of precedence for benefciaries of a serv- ice member's life insurance policy
• providing an order of precedence for beneficiaries of a service member’s life insurance policy
• reversing injunction of SGLI policy benefits disbursement as barred by statutory anti-attachment provision and noting, “[a]s the trial court intimated, respondents may have a claim against the insured’s estate for” breach of contract
• attaching no significance to fact that decree resulted from “voluntary agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).