Skip to main content
· 4/23/1998

Todd A. Richardson, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Borrowers Similarly Situated v. National City Bank of Evansville

Citations

  • 141 F.3d 1228
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7827
  • 1998 WL 191786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for purposes of interpreting administrative regulations, include is a term of illustration, not limitation
  • “include” was not a term of limitation when interpreting an administrative regulation
  • “‘Include’ is a word of illustration, not limitation.”
  • “‘Include’ is a word of illustration, not limitation.”
  • “‘Include’ is a word of illustration, not limitation.”
  • “‘Include’ is a word of illustration, not limitation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Cummings, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.