· 11/17/1975
Toda v. Tanaka
Citations
- 423 U.S. 989
- 96 S. Ct. 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when assessing claim splitting, “we look to the factual predicate of the claims asserted, not the legal theories upon which the plaintiff relies.”
- holding there is sufficient privity between husband and wife to bind the wife to the judgment in the suit brought by her husband
- “[A] bankruptcy court’s order confirming a plan of reorganization is given the same effect as a district court’s judgment on the merits for claim preclusion purposes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.