Skip to main content
· 11/17/1975

Toda v. Tanaka

Citations

  • 423 U.S. 989
  • 96 S. Ct. 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when assessing claim splitting, “we look to the factual predicate of the claims asserted, not the legal theories upon which the plaintiff relies.”
  • holding there is sufficient privity between husband and wife to bind the wife to the judgment in the suit brought by her husband
  • “[A] bankruptcy court’s order confirming a plan of reorganization is given the same effect as a district court’s judgment on the merits for claim preclusion purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.