Skip to main content
· 6/10/2005

Toca Producers v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Citations

  • 411 F.3d 262
  • 366 U.S. App. D.C. 286
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10795
  • 2005 WL 1364700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the prudential standing doctrine, like the abstention doctrine, represents the sort of threshold question that may be resolved before addressing jurisdiction”
  • even though the challenged orders appeared to be “final agency action within the meaning of the APA,” the orders were not “sufficiently final” for judicial review because the agency’s ongoing action in a separate docket could “resolv[e] the issues raised” in the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.