· 6/10/2005
Toca Producers v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Citations
- 411 F.3d 262
- 366 U.S. App. D.C. 286
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10795
- 2005 WL 1364700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the prudential standing doctrine, like the abstention doctrine, represents the sort of threshold question that may be resolved before addressing jurisdiction”
- even though the challenged orders appeared to be “final agency action within the meaning of the APA,” the orders were not “sufficiently final” for judicial review because the agency’s ongoing action in a separate docket could “resolv[e] the issues raised” in the appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.