Skip to main content
· 12/3/2012

Toby J. Sutton v. Patricia Bailey

Citations

  • 702 F.3d 444
  • 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1089
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24790
  • 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,688
  • 2012 WL 5990291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there need not be a delay between the notice and the opportunity to respond
  • stating that \a right is clearly established if the contours of the right are sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right\
  • \We have repeatedly observed that an employer need not disclose 'all of the details of the charges against the employee.' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Loken, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.