Skip to main content
· 3/1/2002

Toby D. Nelson v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.

Citations

  • 282 F.3d 1057
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1929
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2413
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3291
  • 2002 WL 316714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the FCRA requires consumer to “filter” his complaint about inaccurate information through the credit reporting agency
  • holding consumers have a private right of action 15 against furnishers for violations of § 1681s–2(b)
  • discussing the ban on private enforcement actions Sections 1681s-2(c) and 1681s-2(d) produce
  • discussing the ban on private enforcement actions Sections 1681s-2(c) and 1681s-2(d) produce
  • “That with these words Congress created a private right of action for 18 consumers cannot be doubted. That right is to sue for violation of any requirement ‘imposed with 19 respect to any consumer.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Noonan, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.