Tobias Frank v. Derrick Schultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prisoner has no due process claim where “any procedural error was corrected through the administrative appeal process”
• holding 25 that inmate’s due process claim failed when any procedural error was corrected by not imposing 26 1 penalty on inmate
• no compensable due process violation where 16 procedural error is later corrected through administrative process and prisoner ultimately did not 17 lose good-time credits
• no deprivation of due process rights 6 where procedural error was corrected through the administrative appeal process
• no due process claim where any procedural error was corrected through the administrative appeal process
• due process satisfied where administrative appeal corrected inmate’s record and restored loss of 14 days’ good-time credits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).