Skip to main content
· 8/25/2011

To v. U.S. Bancorp

Citations

  • 651 F.3d 888
  • 191 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2513
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17740
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,253
  • 2011 WL 3715411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining summary judgment “is appropriately granted when an employer’s decision to terminate an employee is reasonable as a matter of law”
  • employer did not “forfeit its right to rely on written policies by being willing to occasionally forgive violation of those policies in the face of extenuating circumstances and equitable concerns”
  • “An assertion that a party does not recall an event does not itself create a question of material fact about whether the event did, in fact, occur.”
  • “An assertion that a party does not recall an event does not itself create a question of material fact about whether the event did, in fact, occur.”
  • “An assertion that a party does not recall an event does not itself create a question of material fact about whether the event did, in fact, occur.”
  • “An assertion that a party does not recall an event does not itself create a question of material fact about whether the event did, in fact, occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Beam, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.