TM Patents, L.P v. International Business MacHines Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the meaning of claims at an earlier claim construction, that construction was binding on the plaintiff
• stating that “[the defendant’s] invocation of judicial estoppel is improper, as that doctrine applies only to inconsistent factual positions, not to issues of law”
• prior claim construction in action against alleged infringers barred patent owner from relitigating the claim construction against another alleged infringer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).