TK Stanley, Inc. v. Cason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding permanent disability, as it was a separate subject matter from causation
• \Permanent disability is a separate subject matter from causation\; trial court found in error when admitting expert testimony on causation in light of interrogatory response
• trial court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding permanent disability, as it was a separate subject matter from causation
• trial court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding permanent disability, as it was a separate subject matter from causation
• question on voir dire should have elicited a response in light of juror’s knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).