Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a contract may be unenforceable based on procedural unconscionability only
• recognizing that a contract may be unenforceable based on procedural unconscionability only
• explaining that “ignorance of the 22 1 contents of a contract expressed in a written instrument does not ordinarily affect the 2 liability of one who signs it or who accepts it otherwise than by signing it”
• ‘Washington courts recognize that a contracting party cannot waive a statutory right before the right exists.”
• \Washington courts recognize that a contracting party cannot waive a statutory right before the right exists.\
• considering whether an arbitration agreement existed before analyzing whether the arbitration agreement was enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).