· 2/16/1995
Tivoli Enterprises, Inc. v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.
Citations
- 646 N.E.2d 943
- 207 Ill. Dec. 109
- 269 Ill. App. 3d 638
- 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1226
- 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 89
- 1995 WL 65506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- bowling lane construction contract was predominantly for goods, so dismissal under the UCC statute of limitations was proper
- bowling lane construction contract was predominantly for goods, so dismissal under the UCC statute of limitations was proper
- “issues raised for the first time in the reply brief do not merit consideration on appeal”
- \issues raised for the first time in the reply brief do not merit consideration on appeal\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.