Titus v. Vansickle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant was not entrapped when the informant’s misconduct was not attributable to the police because the police “had no control over him when he committed his reprehensible acts” and the only evidence of entrapment was the informant’s misbehavior
• “[i]nitial entrapment does not immunize a defendant from criminal liability for subsequent transactions that he readily and willingly undertook.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).