Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a tax lien transfer agreement was not a credit transaction under TILA because \the nature of the underlying claim\ as a property tax had not \been extinguished\
• concluding that the general usury statute’s application is limited to “the loan or use of money”
• deciding that defendants were debt collectors for purposes of a motion for summary judgment
• holding that § 1692a(6)(C) applies only to state “officers” or “employees” and that it “does not extend to those who are merely in a contractual relationship with the government”
• deciding that defendants were debt collectors for purposes of a motion for summary judgment
• explaining that “an assignee may be deemed a ‘debt collector’ if the obligation is already in default when it is assigned” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).