· 3/6/2001
Titmas v. Superior Court
Citations
- 87 Cal. App. 4th 738
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 2405
- 104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 803
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1918
- 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[ajlthough plaintiffs made certain expenditures for an environmental impact study ... and other preliminary inspections, such did not vest any rights in plaintiffs since there was no unnecessary delay, hindrance or misleading by the local officials”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crosby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.