Skip to main content
· 11/30/1896

Titlow v. Cascade Oat Meal Co.

Citations

  • 15 Wash. 652
  • 47 P. 19
  • 1896 Wash. LEXIS 272

Syllabus

<p>FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE — ACTION TO SET ASIDE — SUFFICIENCY OF COMPLAINT — ACTION BY RECEIVER — PROOF OF AUTHORITY.</p> <p>Technical objections to the form rather than to the substance of a pleading alleging fraud will be disregarded after judgment, when the case has been fully tried upon the issue.</p> <p>In an action by a receiver, failure to introduce in evidence the order appointing him will not entitle defendant to a non-suit, when the plaintiff testifies without objection that he is such receiver, and the action is instituted in the court which had appointed him receiver, and there is no showing of want of authority to bring suit.</p>

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.