Skip to main content
· 10/7/1999

Titanium Metals Corp. v. Dallas County Appraisal District

Citations

  • 3 S.W.3d 63
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5691
  • 1999 WL 557766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a section 25.25(c)(3) motion is not a proper means to contest the value of personal property at the location described in the roll
  • “[T]he ‘form’ of the property described in the appraisal roll is ‘personal property.’ . . . Because we conclude that property did in fact exist in the form (i.e., personal property) and at the location described in the appraisal roll, we conclude that amending the roll under section 25.25(c)(3
  • “[T]he ‘form’ of the property described in the appraisal roll is ‘personal property.’ . . . Because we conclude that property did in fact exist in the form (i.e., personal property) and at the location described in the appraisal roll, we conclude that amending the roll under section 25.25(c)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whittington, Roach, O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.