· 1/15/1841
Tissott v. Bowles
Citations
- 17 La. 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the public interest is “better served” if grantees are not forced to choose between Byrne JAG funding and “losing hard-fought goodwill amongst the immigrant community” (citation omitted)
- finding the Attorney General's imposition of the Conditions on the Byrne JAG grant was final
- denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss an as-applied Tenth Amendment challenge to Section 1373
- addressing ripeness but not expressly reaching the issue of standing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.