Skip to main content
· 1/15/1841

Tissott v. Bowles

Citations

  • 17 La. 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the public interest is “better served” if grantees are not forced to choose between Byrne JAG funding and “losing hard-fought goodwill amongst the immigrant community” (citation omitted)
  • finding the Attorney General's imposition of the Conditions on the Byrne JAG grant was final
  • denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss an as-applied Tenth Amendment challenge to Section 1373
  • addressing ripeness but not expressly reaching the issue of standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.