Skip to main content
· 3/15/1983

Tisoncik v. Szczepankiewicz

Citations

  • 446 N.E.2d 1271
  • 113 Ill. App. 3d 240
  • 68 Ill. Dec. 874
  • 1983 Ill. App. LEXIS 1586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant who had not asserted a counterclaim for contribution against its codefendants lacked standing to appeal the dismissal of the codefendants from the case
  • defendant who had not asserted a counterclaim for contribution against its codefendants lacked standing to appeal the dismissal of the codefendants from the case
  • defendant who did not assert counterclaim for contribution against codefendant in whose favor trial court granted directed verdict lacked standing to appeal the dismissal of the codefendant from the case
  • defendant who did not assert counterclaim for contribution against codefendant in whose favor trial court granted directed verdict lacked standing to appeal the dismissal of the codefendant from the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.