Tishman Midwest Management Corp. v. Wayne Jarvis, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[i]f the contract terms are unambiguous, the parties’ intent must be ascertained exclusively from the express language of the contract, as a matter of law”
• rejecting interpretation that would require one party to pay legal fees twice
• rejecting interpretation that would require one party to pay legal fees twice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).