Tisdale v. Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the facts supporting qualified immunity must appear on the face of the complaint
• \ Matthews I makes it clear that the existence of a civilian analogue is typically a prerequisite to a holding that the employee was speaking as a citizen.\
• ʺMatthews I makes it clear that the 16 existence of a civilian analogue is typically a prerequisite to a holding that the 17 employee was speaking as a citizen.ʺ
• “If a factual determination is a necessary predicate to the resolution of whether immunity is a bar, review is postponed and we dismiss the appeal.” (alteration accepted) (quoting State Emps. Bargaining Agent Coal. v. Rowland, 494 F.3d 71, 82 (2d Cir. 2007))
• question of law for court but highly fact-dependent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).