Tisa N. Crawford v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a similarly situated employee is one who is “comparable to the plaintiff in all material respects” (emphasis in original)
• holding that a similarly situated employee is one who is “comparable to plaintiff in all material respects”
• noting that the “similarly situated inquiry is a flexible, common-sense one that asks, at bottom, whether ‘there are enough common factors ... to allow for meaningful comparison in order to divine whether intentional discrimination was at play.’ ”
• stating an employee is similarly situated if the employee is comparable to the plaintiff “in all material respects”
• requiring the plaintiff to show “the members of the comparison group are sufficiently comparable to her to suggest that she was singled out for worse treatment”
• hold- ing that a similarly situated employee is one who is “comparable to plaintiff in all material respects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).