Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that valid legislative rule is “binding upon courts as a statute” and constitutes legislative enactment
• noting that DEP is the executive branch, and is assigned various duties to implement and enforce environmental statutes and regulations
• ruling on challenge to regulation in context of appeal from enforcement action before Environmental Hearing Board
• stating that “[t]his Court follows a two-step analysis when reviewing an agency’s interpretation of its governing regulations: (1) whether the interpretation of the regulation is erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation, and (2
• explaining that an agency’s duly promulgated legislative-type regulation “is valid and binding upon courts as a statute so long as it is (a) adopted within the agency’s granted power, (b) issued pursuant to proper procedure, and (c) reasonable.”
• finding regulation valid and binding on courts as long as it is adopted within the agency’s granted power, issued pursuant to a proper procedure, and is reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).