Tipton v. Kennard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the juvenile’s court’s denial of the mother’s motion for a continuance was not prejudicial because the substance of the doctor’s testimony was highly speculative
• court will not reverse a denial of a continuance in absence of both an abuse of discretion and prejudice to the moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).