· 3/22/1988
Tipton v. Barton
Citations
- 747 S.W.2d 325
- 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1359
- 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 244
- 1988 WL 23725
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that attorney billing statements do not fall within the attorney- client privilege
- providing meaningful review where the contested, undisclosed record was submitted under seal to the appellate court
- billing statements that merely identified attorney’s preparation of pleadings, phone calls, meetings and discussions without detailed entries that advised, analyzed or discussed privileged communications were not privileged
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Karohl, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.