Skip to main content
· 3/22/1988

Tipton v. Barton

Citations

  • 747 S.W.2d 325
  • 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1359
  • 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 244
  • 1988 WL 23725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that attorney billing statements do not fall within the attorney- client privilege
  • providing meaningful review where the contested, undisclosed record was submitted under seal to the appellate court
  • billing statements that merely identified attorney’s preparation of pleadings, phone calls, meetings and discussions without detailed entries that advised, analyzed or discussed privileged communications were not privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Karohl, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.