Tipton v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting employer's argument that in order to avoid the time-bar an employee must again request a hearing every time a previously-requested hearing is cancelled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Solomon v. Interior Regional Housing Authority
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-07-21· cited 19×
• Christianson v. Conrad-Houston Insurance
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-02-21· cited 17×
• Wagner v. Stuckagain Heights
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-11-08· cited 16×
• Long v. Holland America Line Westours, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-07-13· cited 15×
• Holderness v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-06-22· cited 12×
• Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc. v. Adams
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-08-21· cited 9×
• State, Department of Revenue v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 6×
• Kim v. Alyeska Seafoods, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-12-05· cited 5×
• Huston v. Coho Electric
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-09-27· cited 3×
• Lindekugel v. Fluor Alaska, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-03-28· cited 2×
• Piquniq Management Corp. v. Reeves
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-11-06· cited 1×
• Pruitt v. Providence Extended Care
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-03-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. Racine
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-03-01· cited 63×
• State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of Haines
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-05-08· cited 47×
• Suh v. Pingo Corp.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 18×
• Jonathan v. Doyon Drilling, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-03-03· cited 15×
• Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-07-08· cited 14×
• Hahm v. Hills
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-10-10· cited 10×