Tipping-Cestari v. Kilhenny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a respondent convicted of conspiracy to commit fraud need only demonstrate that the potential, rather than actual, loss to the victim exceeded $10,000
• holding that to be removable for having committed a conspiracy to commit fraud, the respondent’s conviction for conspiracy had to be a categorical match to the generic definition of conspiracy
• holding that to be removable for having committed a conspiracy to commit fraud, the respondent’s conviction for conspiracy had to be a categorical match to the generic definition of conspiracy
• outlining a “three-fold burden” the DHS must bear to establish that a respondent is removable for an aggravated felony under sections 101(a)(43)(M)(i) and (U)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).