Tinsley v. Fielder's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants could not rely on ORS 30.265(3) to support their motion to substitute the school district for individual defendants because the plaintiff did “not ‘allege[ ] damages in an amount equal to or less than’ the statutory damage limit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).