Skip to main content
· 1/15/1832

Tinslar v. May

Citations

  • 8 Wend. 561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting contention that Apprendi requires enhancements to be considered in determining whether an uncharged offense is necessarily included in a charged offense
  • rejecting contention that Apprendi requires enhancements to be considered in determining whether an uncharged offense is necessarily included in a charged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutherland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.