Tino Villanueva v. Wellesley College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that summary judgment is proper when a plaintiff disputes some facts, but does not adduce sufficient evidence from which the trier could conclude that the defendant failed to meet the applicable legal standard
• ruling that summary judgment is proper when a plaintiff disputes some facts, but does not adduce sufficient evidence from which the trier could conclude that the defendant failed to meet the applicable legal standard
• ruling that summary ___ __________ judgment is proper when a plaintiff disputes some facts, but does not adduce sufficient evidence from which the trier could conclude that the defendant failed to meet the applicable legal standard
• explaining that the plaintiff must show that her qualifications were at least comparable to those of a “middle group of tenure candidates” for which both a grant and a denial of tenure could be justified
• explaining that in addition to showing a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the employer's articulated reason is pretextual, the plaintiff must point to \evidence from which a reasonable inference of discrimination can be drawn\
• suggesting \academic freedom\ is reason a denial of tenure must be obviously or manifestly unsupported to violate Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).