Tinnon v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants’ claim that Mississippi Rule of Evidence 503(f) is unconstitutional was not ripe for review because no trial level proceedings in the case had yet been held pursuant to Rule 503(f), but addressing the issue for reasons of judicial economy
• finding that defendants’ claim that Mississippi Rule of Evidence 503(f) is unconstitutional was not ripe for review because no trial level proceedings in the case had yet been held pursuant to Rule 503(f), but addressing the issue for reasons of judicial economy
• “A party to a suit and/or his attorney should not be allowed to violate an order and collaterally attack it on appeal after they were sanctioned for the violation.”
• “[Wjhere an order is void the violation of such an order is excusable.”
• \[W]here an order is void the violation of such an order is excusable.\
• involves confidentiality of patients' records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).