· 3/8/1996
Tinney v. Shores
Citations
- 77 F.3d 378
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4000
- 1996 WL 75654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that' sovereign immunity under Alabama law “is immunity from suit, not merely a defense from liability”
- holding that section 14 immunizes the state from both suit and liability
- noting that \Alabama case law makes it clear\ that the then-applicable version of the sixth \exception\ does not apply to a sheriff's immunity
- “Alabama intended for its state officers to be immune from suit. As such, the denial of summary judgment based on sovereign immunity is properly before us on interlocutory appeal.”
- “[A]n allegation of prosecution without probable cause must . . . be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment . . . .” (citation omitted)
- “[A]n allegation of prosecution without probable cause must . . . be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment . . . .”(citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Carnes, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.