Skip to main content
· 3/8/1996

Tinney v. Shores

Citations

  • 77 F.3d 378
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4000
  • 1996 WL 75654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that' sovereign immunity under Alabama law “is immunity from suit, not merely a defense from liability”
  • holding that section 14 immunizes the state from both suit and liability
  • noting that \Alabama case law makes it clear\ that the then-applicable version of the sixth \exception\ does not apply to a sheriff's immunity
  • “Alabama intended for its state officers to be immune from suit. As such, the denial of summary judgment based on sovereign immunity is properly before us on interlocutory appeal.”
  • “[A]n allegation of prosecution without probable cause must . . . be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment . . . .” (citation omitted)
  • “[A]n allegation of prosecution without probable cause must . . . be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment . . . .”(citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Carnes, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.