TINNELL v. Invacare Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claims as collaterally estopped because “there is no question that the issue of the timeliness of Plaintiff’s First and Second claims are the same as those . . . on the motion to dismiss the state court action as time-barred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).