Tinius v. Choi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that G.L.c. 236, §4 and G.L.c. 223, §59, prior to the most recent amendments, required a judgment creditor who had secured an attachment to obtain and record a writ of execution in order to preserve its lien
• “an overt act by the officer falling short of an entry upon the land has been held sufficient to mark the commencement of a levy”
• thirty day period in ch. 223 § 59 is one during which attached property shall be held so that it may be taken on execution, while forty day period in ch. 236 § 4 is one during which copy of execution must be deposited in registry of deeds after the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).