Skip to main content
· 1/14/1963

Tiner v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 235 Ark. 1010
  • 363 S.W.2d 532
  • 1963 Ark. LEXIS 750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the description of an easement in a declaration of taking was insufficient because it provided neither the width of the easement nor any limitation on the pathway that would be utilized when traversing land not condemned
  • declaration of taking’s description of a temporary work easement was insufficient when it did not provide the width of the easement and left the exact boundaries unspecified and to be set later by the construction crew

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.