Skip to main content
· 8/17/1988

Tindal v. Norman

Citations

  • 427 N.W.2d 871
  • 1988 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 212
  • 1988 WL 87271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding futility exception to state law exhaustion requirement for challenges to agency decisions applied because “agencies cannot decide issues of statutory validity”
  • stating declaratory order proceeding “contemplates rulings on purely hypothetical sets of facts”
  • “It is undisputed that no exception exists for section 17A.19’s exclusivity for a writ of certiorari.”
  • agency's performance of a statutory duty is \agency action\ as defined in section 17A.2(2)
  • “Although the petition is labeled certiorari, that is not fatal to the district court’s jurisdiction if the instrument may be treated and the case heard through appropriate procedure.”
  • agency’s performance of a statutory duty is “agency action” as defined in section 17A.2(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schultz, Carter, Neuman, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.