· 4/13/1989
Tina M. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDVIK PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 870 F.2d 389
- 1989 WL 27569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although the danger posed by a moving slicing blade was obvious, whether the open and obvious rule would apply to bar recovery was a question of fact where employees had developed a generally safe method of tightening the blade while the machine was running
- although the danger posed by a moving slicing blade was obvious, whether the open and obvious rule would apply to bar recovery was a question of fact where employees had developed a generally safe method of tightening the blade while the machine was running
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Cudahy, Fairchild
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.