Skip to main content
· 4/13/1989

Tina M. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDVIK PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 870 F.2d 389
  • 1989 WL 27569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although the danger posed by a moving slicing blade was obvious, whether the open and obvious rule would apply to bar recovery was a question of fact where employees had developed a generally safe method of tightening the blade while the machine was running
  • although the danger posed by a moving slicing blade was obvious, whether the open and obvious rule would apply to bar recovery was a question of fact where employees had developed a generally safe method of tightening the blade while the machine was running

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Cudahy, Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.