Tina Griffith v. General Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse discretion in declining to strike defendant’s expert testimony when plaintiff “allowed the impasse to continue well beyond the point of good faith efforts to resolve the issue CASE NO. 21-20815-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres without court intervention”
• upholding a district court’s decision not to strike an expert under Fed. R. of Civ. P. 26 where the moving party moved to do so after deposing the expert and the close of discovery
• reviewing district court’s decision concerning Rule 26 disclosures for abuse of discretion
• “[U] nder Geier , when a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard leaves a manufacturer with a choice of safety device options, a state suit that depends on foreclosing one or more of those options is preempted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).