Tin Mew Lee v. Dulles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the burden of avoiding waiver must rest with the party that failed to particularize its objections”
• explaining that objections to interrogatories must be specific and non-boilerplate
• objections to Rule 34 document production requests must be stated with particularity or are waived
• “a court has broad discretion to decide on a case by case basis whether waiver is appropriate.”
• “If a party responding to a discovery request objects, in whole or part, to the discovery, objections must be specific, non-boilerplate and supported by particularized facts where necessary to demonstrate the basis for the objection.”
• failure to object with particularity to document production request waives objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).