Tims v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant whose prior offenses were committed within the “window” period described in Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991
• affirming defendant’s sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, even though statute was found unconstitutional for violation of the single subject rule, because defendant would qualify as habitual violent felony offender under predecessor statute
• if defendant would qualify as an habitual offender under the 1988 version of the statute, he may not challenge the constitutionality of Chapter 89-280

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Freeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-30· cited 9×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-30· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-12· cited 2×
• Lowe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-11· cited 2×
• Atkinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-19· cited 2×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-06· cited 1×
• Payne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-03· cited 1×
• Mays v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-04· cited 1×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-28
• Lopez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-15· cited 34×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-29· cited 16×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-26· cited 15×
• McNeil v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-01· cited 10×
• State v. Combs
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-25· cited 9×