Timothy T. Hampton v. Gary L. Wyant, Warden, East Moline Correctional Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• petitioner imprisoned based on “unlawfully seized evidence is not ‘in custody in violation the Constitution’ ” because the “seizure may have violated the Constitution but the custody does not” (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a))
• “The AEDPA’s changes to § 2254(d) apply only to cases within the scope of § 2254(a), which was not amended in 1996, and Stone is based on an interpretation of § 2254(a) that treats inaccurate administration of the exclusionary rule as outside the scope of that statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).