Skip to main content
· 11/28/2014

Timothy Skalsky v. Independent School District

Citations

  • 772 F.3d 1126
  • 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 657
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22462
  • 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,208
  • 2014 WL 6705367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming, without expressly addressing the issue, that retaliation against a public employee for his wife’s speech is actionable under the First Amendment
  • “Temporal proximity between protected activity and an adverse employment action can constitute evidence the protected activity was a substantial or motivating factor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Wollman, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.