Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that dismissal with prejudice is appropriate for distinct violations of court orders
• explaining that evidence did not show plaintiff’s post‐traumatic stress disorder was responsible for majority of delays
• affirming dismissal with prejudice where plaintiff “engaged in a persistent pattern of intentional delay by willfully disregarding court orders and violating the Federal Rules’
• dismissal with prejudice warranted when litigant violated court’s orders and Federal Rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).