Ninth Circuit· 7/28/2015
Timothy Mayo v. Pcc Structurals
Citations
- 795 F.3d 941
- 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1556
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13065
- 2015 WL 4529357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “an employee can be qualified despite adverse reactions to stress”
- assuming the plaintiff was disabled, and then discussing whether he was qualified at the time of his discharge
- upholding summary judgment based on uncontested evidence of Mayo’s “credible, detailed, and unwavering plan to kill his supervisors”
- “An essential function of almost every job is the ability to handle stress and interact with others.”
- an 14 “essential function of almost every job is the ability to appropriate handle stress and interact with 15 others”
- “An essential function of almost every job is the ability to handle stress and interact with others.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Owens, Hayes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationNinth Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 377×
- Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official CapacitySixth Circuit· 1999-11-29· cited 247×
- Robert Dark v. Curry County Curry County Road Department Dan Crumley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Curry County RoadmasterNinth Circuit· 2006-07-06· cited 204×
- Marquita Palmer v. Circuit Court of Cook County, IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1997-06-26· cited 146×
- Michael Curley v. City of North Las VegasNinth Circuit· 2014-12-02· cited 129×
- Norman Hutton v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationNinth Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 95×
- Bodenstab v. County of CookSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-22· cited 91×
- Valentine v. Standard & Poor'sS.D. New York· 1999-06-24· cited 84×
- Melanie Williams v. Motorola, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2002-08-29· cited 77×
- Donald R. Newland v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyNinth Circuit· 1996-04-18· cited 70×
- Stephanie Gambini v. Total Renal Care, Inc., D/B/A Davita, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-04-24· cited 54×
- Matthew Weaving v. City of HillsboroNinth Circuit· 2014-08-15· cited 49×
- Mario Echazabal v. Chevron Usa, Inc. Irwin Industries, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2003-07-23· cited 40×
- Collins v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-06-17· cited 21×
- Mammone v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-05-12· cited 17×
- Adams v. AldersonDistrict of Columbia· 1989-06-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.