· 2/27/1996
Timothy L. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SATURN DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 78 F.3d 424
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 2128
- 141 A.L.R. Fed. 667
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1262
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3147
- 1996 WL 80445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing the burden of proof in nondisclosure cases as at a lower threshold than actual bias cases
- upholding denial of vacatur despite the arbitration panel being composed of defendant’s franchise operators
- decision to deny a continuance will not be reversed except upon a showing of clear abuse
- the “party alleging evident partiality [in actual bias cases] must establish specific facts which indicate improper motives” (alteration in original; citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bright, Skopil, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.