Skip to main content
· 2/27/1996

Timothy L. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SATURN DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 424
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 2128
  • 141 A.L.R. Fed. 667
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1262
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3147
  • 1996 WL 80445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing the burden of proof in nondisclosure cases as at a lower threshold than actual bias cases
  • upholding denial of vacatur despite the arbitration panel being composed of defendant’s franchise operators
  • decision to deny a continuance will not be reversed except upon a showing of clear abuse
  • the “party alleging evident partiality [in actual bias cases] must establish specific facts which indicate improper motives” (alteration in original; citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Skopil, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.