Skip to main content
· 1/29/2002

Timothy L. Moysis, Appellee/cross v. Dtg Datanet, Formerly Known as Futuristic, Inc., Formerly Doing Business as Computerland, Inc., Appellant/cross

Citations

  • 278 F.3d 819
  • 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1217
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “suspicious timing can support a finding of discrimination”
  • noting only an actual disability was at issue even though the ADA also provides a cause of action for a perceived disability or a record of disability
  • Evidence which could and should have been presented at trial cannot be presented in Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion
  • district court did not err in denying front pay without hearing where plaintiff had failed to offer to district court either a reason why hearing was necessary or a showing of data that would support award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Bright, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.