Skip to main content
· 6/3/2002

Timothy K. Ueland v. United States

Citations

  • 291 F.3d 993
  • 58 Fed. R. Serv. 996
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1060
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10604
  • 2002 WL 1159627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Illinois expertise requirement cannot flout federal evidentiary rules in FTCA claim brought in a federal forum
  • Voykin not relevant where Federal Rules of Evidence assure reliability
  • “Rule 32(a), as a freestanding exception to the hearsay rule, is one of the ‘other rules’ to which Fed. R. Evid. 802 refers. Evidence authorized by Rule 32(a) cannot be excluded as hearsay, unless it would be inadmissible even if delivered in court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.